(no subject)
Oct. 17th, 2007 07:25 pmI'm seeking some enlightenment from those of you well-versed in Supernatural -- the show itself, not so much the fandom, although these things would have most likely been discussed in fandom. It's sometimes hard to separate fact from opinion when reading fan discussions, so I'm wondering...
1) I've seen suggestions that writer/producer Sera Gamble is not terribly fond of Dean's character and her interpretation of him (as a flat-out arrogant jackass) sometimes has to be toned down. True?
2) I've heard that CW head Dawn Ostroff is not terribly fond of the show, period, and that every season so far has boiled down to a battle of wills to keep it on the air. Supposedly she's been quite vocal about her dislike for the show. True? It seems pretty impolitic to me that a network president would openly slam one of her own properties, no matter what her personal opinion of it happens to be.
1) I've seen suggestions that writer/producer Sera Gamble is not terribly fond of Dean's character and her interpretation of him (as a flat-out arrogant jackass) sometimes has to be toned down. True?
2) I've heard that CW head Dawn Ostroff is not terribly fond of the show, period, and that every season so far has boiled down to a battle of wills to keep it on the air. Supposedly she's been quite vocal about her dislike for the show. True? It seems pretty impolitic to me that a network president would openly slam one of her own properties, no matter what her personal opinion of it happens to be.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-18 01:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-18 01:23 am (UTC)I think Raelle Tucker was the big Deangirl on the show and that came through both in the episodes she wrote by herself and those she wrote with Sera Gamble. So I'm wondering what Tucker's departure will mean for Dean's character. As to Dawn Ostroff, I think that SPN unfortunately is NOT one of their most successful series (that honor probably goes to America's Next Top Model or something) but at the same time I can't imagine that a network president is going to come right out and say bad things about a show that's still on the air -- unless she has some strange resentment towards the shows that the CW inherited from the old WB. Even so, it would seem like bad form and bad business.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-18 05:37 am (UTC)Btw, your comment about 3.02 where you said how Dean becomes a third character makes me sad. :')
no subject
Date: 2007-10-18 10:52 pm (UTC)Btw, your comment about 3.02 where you said how Dean becomes a third character makes me sad.
I was just speculating on what might happen if Ruby becomes to prominent. Let's hope that doesn't come to pass!
no subject
Date: 2007-10-18 06:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-18 10:42 pm (UTC)Heh...where do you think I get this propaganda from in the first place?